Skip to content

Author: Dawn

I'm Dawn Lawson, a librarian and translator. When I'm not at my day job or struggling with 19th-century Japanese, I'm doing something related to chess. I've found the online chess community in Twitter and elsewhere to be super welcoming, and I wanted to give back by sharing a record of my own experiences with this great pastime.

My First Tournament

In the short time that I have been playing chess, I have been wanting to play in a tournament. I don’t really know why, except that I like to go all the way when I do things. I have also wanted a rating, and tournaments can be a way to get one. 

It’s pretty silly for a beginner to want a rating, of course, because any rating at this stage will be very low and thus likely discouraging. Still, a rating can be a way to measure your progress. 

Besides, given my interest in women and chess, I couldn’t resist when I saw that the Chesskid USA Girls and Women’s Chess Championship 2022 was being held online on April 16. I didn’t expect to win any games, but the early bird registration fee was low, and so I signed up. I was happy to learn that there would be a “warmup” one week before the tournament. Perfect, I thought. The tournament itself might be brutal–my teacher did not contradict me when I said that I had no expectation of winning and said that she had lost all her games in her first tournament –but a warmup seemed unintimidating. Until I signed in and found out that it consisted of six games timed at five minutes each! 

I will set aside the topic of speed chess vs. classical (slow) chess as one that could occupy several blog posts, but suffice it to say that the fastest game I had played up to that point was ten minutes. I played those six five-minute games and lost them all. One thing I learned from them is that five minutes is not zero minutes, even though it sounds like that to the inexperienced. Some kind of chess could be played; checkmates could result. Thus I went into the tournament proper with a feeling of relief that the games would be a leisurely fifteen minutes. 

As the tournament was about to begin, I saw that the women’s division had only 12 participants; (happily, there were ten times as many playing in the girls’ divisions). I was very nervous during the first game, partly because my opponent made her moves quickly, but I calmed down after that and had one or two moments when I thought I was playing well, until I was checkmated from an unexpected direction. As expected, I lost all of my games. But when the tournament ended, I didn’t feel too bad, even when I saw the screen with rankings and ratings showing me in 12th place with a rating of 100, the lowest possible. I had played six chess games in a row, something that I hadn’t thought my brain was even capable of doing. The tournament was streamed, which gave me a kind of rock star feeling, and even though the girls’ games received most of the coverage, my poor husband watched all three hours and twenty-two minutes. He said that when one of my games showed up, the 12-year-old commentator, Alice Lee (a FIDE Master and Woman International Master), observed that my position was weak. Afterward, I reviewed a computer analysis of the games and found that all six games were not one continuous blunder, as it had seemed in my memory. Like Tolstoy’s unhappy families, each of my games had been lost in its own way.  

Recommendation of the Week: For the second week in a row, I want to cite an episode of Daniel Lona’s Chess Experience podcast. This time it is his interview of FIDE Master and founder of the Charlotte Chess Center Peter Giannatos, on the topic of “The Common Mistakes Made by Adult Improvers (and How to Fix Them).” Several times I felt that Peter was talking directly to me. Check it out; maybe you will feel that way, too.  

Blundering

The word “blunder,” which can be briefly defined as “a critically bad move,” is a term of art in chess. Everyone who plays chess is bound to blunder. One can derive some comfort from Wikipedia’s article on the subject, which documents fourteen games in which famous grandmasters blundered. But beginners blunder quite frequently and even repeat the same blunder–such as losing their queen–many times. A blunder often leads to a loss, which is unpleasant for most of us. And for Type A personalities and perfectionists, losing can be so painful that they try to avoid situations in which losing is likely or even just possible. Some people may even start playing chess and soon abandon it permanently because of this pain. But please don’t! If I can withstand it, you can, too. 

How? First of all, I promise–and one purpose of this blog is to demonstrate this–that the joys of chess far outweigh the pain, even when a chess loss feels like a monumental failure (heck, even when you play consecutive games that feel that way). Below I list just a few of the counterbalancing factors.

 ♟  The sheer beauty of the pieces on the board, even on the computer screen. 

 ♟  The curious and delightful vocabulary of the game, from the names of the openings (Nathan Rose has written two wonderful books about these) to the words used to describe techniques and tactics, like fianchetto. 

 ♟  The enjoyment a beginner can experience in the act of playing, even though she also senses vaguely that the game has endless depths that are far beyond her ken. (The closest thing to this that I have experienced is learning a language like Japanese. Two syllabaries and thousands of characters?!? Yes, but every step of the challenging journey has its own rewards.) 

 ♟ The wonderful camaraderie of the global chess community that you can tap into simply by listening to a chess podcast, viewing a chess video on YouTube, or getting involved with a community like the Casual Chess Cafe.

Resilience has become a buzzword, but it truly is a crucial life skill. Bearing up under the many early blunders and losses that a chess beginner encounters will strengthen your resilience. Chess game analysis has two additional categories of errors that are less severe than “blunder”: “mistakes” and “inaccuracies.” When you finish a game on a platform like lichess.org or chess.com, the software conveniently tallies your inaccuracies, mistakes, and blunders (chess.com softens the blows somewhat by also listing your “good,” “excellent,” and “brilliant” moves). When I make them in life, inaccuracies and mistakes can be devastating to me. But when I look at a chess game analysis, it is the blunders that get the most of my attention and further study. I look at the mistakes and inaccuracies, but given their place in the scheme of things, I simply note them mentally and vow not to repeat them in the future. Chess is helping me bring this attitude to life situations as well. 

Recommendation of the Week: Listen to Daniel Lona interview Jennifer Shahade on his podcast, the Chess Experience. They talk about Shahade’s important new book, Chess Queens, and all things women in chess. 

Get a Teacher!

There are so many chess resources available online–the podcasts, the spaced repetition tactics ebooks, the YouTube videos, the analysis tools on the chess platforms, the “studies” in lichess–that it is tempting to think that you could teach yourself chess if you just applied yourself and took advantage of them in the right way. That will go a long way. But my experience has been that even while using a great tool, questions arise that only a human being can answer. For example, the analyzers are happy to tell you if you have made an inaccuracy, a mistake, or a blunder and what would have been the best move. But they don’t tell you why. And that is crucial. After I had accumulated more questions than I could tolerate, I decided to invest in private lessons. Yes, it’s an investment and you can enjoy and learn chess plenty without it. If you don’t feel you can make the investment now, there are still ways to get instruction. One is to seek out a local chess club. Most weren’t meeting during the pandemic, but they are starting up again. There you can use a time-honored way to learn the game that is largely ignored in the online world: asking your opponent to review the game with you after you play. Also there are people out there who will give low-cost or even free lessons if you ask. I’ve seen offers of the latter posted in the various Facebook groups dedicated to chess.


Actually, before I found my teacher, I found the marvelous group that she runs, the Casual Chess Cafe. Amanda Ross founded this as an in-person group in London in 2015. She moved it online when the pandemic hit, and that’s how I found it. In the online cafe, which is free and open to all, we chat on Zoom and play chess as a group for 90 minutes starting at 12:30 pm Eastern time on Fridays. Amanda creates a very relaxed and welcoming environment, complete with cat antics. From there I got to taking her wonderful women-only group classes. She records the classes on Zoom for you to watch if you can’t make it in real time, but it is much better to come to the classes live because at various points during the class you get to play online practice games, which she comments on. In addition, she also holds a separate practice session for the class on a different day, in which we play exclusively and get her feedback. Eventually I added private lessons with Amanda to my chess regime. She has been the perfect first coach for me and very gracefully weathered our first few lessons, when I besieged her with the zillion questions I had accumulated while struggling with chess on my own for a year or so.

Lauren Goodkind is a great example of a teacher that beginners can follow and learn from on YouTube. She frequently posts episodes that recap games between beginning players, to which she adds insightful commentary. There is a seemingly infinite amount of chess content on YouTube, of which I have barely scratched the surface. So far the series I have found most helpful is John Bartholomew’s Chess Fundamentals. Please leave a comment letting us know what chess videos you recommend.

 

Chess Books on Steroids


As I have mentioned, one of the many attractions of chess is that it is such a book-rich pastime. But I don’t mean just books typeset on paper or displaying on your Kindle. Several companies have taken many of the best chess tactics books and integrated them with an online chessboard. Most notable of these is Chessable, which has gone one step further and add spaced repetition functionality to online versions of the books. My first experience with spaced repetition came from foreign language learning. Basically, a computer algorithm decides the perfect intervals at which you should review vocabulary for optimal retention. Chessable does the same thing with tactics and other things chess learners study, such as openings. I found one of the best possible of these ebooks near the beginning of my journey. I originally tried to use it on my Kindle, but once I got the Chessable edition I never looked back. The book–actually a series of five books–is called Learn Chess the Right Way, and you will. You can try some Chessable content at no charge–they take a lot of the courses they sell and make a free version of them called “Short and Sweet.” In addition to being great free resources, they also help you decide whether you might want to spring for the full course. They also have a generous return policy, as I learned when I purchased a book that I soon learned was for players ranked far above me.

The Pods!

As a librarian and bibliophile, part of the appeal of chess for me is that there is a seemingly endless number of books on the subject. Just reading about them or hearing them spoken about on YouTube is immensely enjoyable. But here I’m going to write about another genre of chess resource that has given me priceless knowledge in a most pleasurable way. First and foremost for me is Ben Johnson’s Perpetual Chess. Ben is a joy to listen to, not least because he is a a very thoughtful and conscientious host and interviewer. He rotates the subject of his pods among three themes: interviews of chess champions and personalities, interviews of adult chess improvers, and recaps of books (!). For the book recaps, he usually focuses on a classic chess book, which both he and his guest reread in preparation for the episode so that they can have an in-depth discussion. For the adult improver, one of the best things he does regarding books is to talk about what rating level of chess player it is good for. One reason this is important is that many of the most discussed chess books are not for players with ratings under 1000, sometimes not even for those under 1500 or 2000. It is easy to get caught up in someone’s praise of a chess book and buy it only to discover that it is barely comprehensible for you at your current level (yes, I am speaking from extensive personal experience), The ancillary material Ben provides for Perpetual Chess is also incomparably thorough. He even provides a list of the books recapped, which includes the readers’ recommended rating. His podcast notes are the best, bar none, too!

You won’t be surprised to hear that Ladies Knight is another favorite pod of mine. Its creator, Jennifer Shahade, is my favorite chess player; I’ll publish a post about her and her wonderful new book, Chess Queens, soon. One of her many hats is as the director of women’s programs for US Chess. On the pod she interviews prominent women with connections to chess, most of whom you will not have heard of, which is one of the excellent reasons to give this a listen. Jennifer is a very good listener who thoughtfully steers the conversation into directions unearthed by the interviewee’s latest response.


Other podcasts I enjoy listening to include Daniel Lona’s Chess Experience and Kevin Scull’s Chess Journeys. We chess learners are very lucky that so many people take the time to share their chess journeys with us in this form. There are many more out there; feel free to leave a comment about your own favorites

Playing Online

Most people reading this will know that the two most popular online chess platforms are lichess and chess.com. Lichess is entirely free, and thus is often used for group chess activities like tournaments so that there is no cost to participants. I like the lichess interface very much and play there frequently. Chess.com has a free version, but you need to pay a fee if you want certain features. I feel it’s worth it, but it’s not at all necessary if you already use lichess. The fact is that I subscribed to chess.com it because I thought its analysis feature was better than that of lichess, but that was largely a beginner’s mistaken impression. If you try them both you will see that the analysis on chess.com is much more straightforward and easy to follow; however, lichess tells you much more, if you give yourself time to learn the various ways it presents the analysis, and there are many YouTube videos that do just that. There are many online comparisons of the two main online platforms: here is one of the more balanced comparisons. As you browse, you will see that the fact that the two sites use different rating systems has spawned many gigabytes of online discussion, but I will save the topic of ratings for a future post.

Early Partners

Like many Queen’s Gambit fans, I went on from that TV series to chess movies, of which there are plenty of lists online, like this one. All are great and inspiring, although Rocky-like stories of triumph predominate, so don’t watch them all at once. It was the French-German production, Queen to Play, that gave me the tip that became an important early turning point in my chess learning. The protagonist of the film is a maid, and when her family learns of her chess-playing they give her a computerized chess set as a gift. The gadget lover in me couldn’t resist this, and I soon acquired the DGT Centaur. From where I am in my journey a year and half later, I see that, given the existence of lichess.org, chess.com, and others, there isn’t a strong argument for investing in one of these, but I wouldn’t trade the many early mornings I spent playing with it when I was first falling under the spell of the game. It also eased my husband and me into playing against each other. He, too, hadn’t played in many decades, and hadn’t begun studying as I had. Instead of just floundering and choosing moves at random when we got stuck, we relied on the Centaur’s “Hint” feature. It suggests and rates the many possible moves available from any position. We don’t rely on that feature much anymore, but we still enjoy using the Centaur as a nice-sized over-the-board set that logs our moves for later analysis. Despite the wonderful online sites, which I will discuss next time, I’m waiting eagerly for the ChessUp , which, after seemingly interminable delays, should be available soon. It promises to be able to connect to one’s online chess activities in interesting ways.

How It Began

My current chess journey was launched, as were a great many others, by Netflix’ airing of The Queen’s Gambit in October 2020 (based on Walter Tevis’ great novel of the same name). That this drama became available during the lockdown phase of a global pandemic helped us to not merely binge the drama but to try to live it afterward by taking up chess for the first time ever, or for the first time since a brief introduction to the game in childhood.

I’ve kept a personal journal for more than four decades, so it wasn’t much of a leap for me to start one about my chess learning. Unfortunately, I didn’t log the initial phase with much regularity or in any detail: the first entry appears three months after I watched The Queen’s Gambit, when I began–too soon, I know now–looking at books about openings. I also did other strangely random things, like memorizing the moves of the Opera Game, which I have since forgotten. I think that memorizing that and other games or sequences can be helpful, but the benefits of that activity were entirely lost on me at that early stage. The next significant development in chess journey was, again, inspired by a popular media depiction of the game, but a less well-known one.