Skip to content

Category: chess playing sites

Some Progress, Finally

Just as I was beginning to think that my chess would never improve, it did–not so much in rating points–but very definitely in my ability to look at the board and evaluate my positions. In the past, I would sometimes avoid playing because of loss of confidence following a loss. My finger would hover over the “Play” button on chess.com, never making contact, or I would stare at the lichess lobby (where one looks for available games) for minutes on end, never daring to make a selection.

Finally, I told myself that in order to make online playing less of a source of anxiety, I would have to do it often. I set a goal of one game per day, with someone within one or two hundred points of my rating, and a time control of 30 minutes. I found that lichess was not practical on weekdays because there were not enough suitable players. But there is always someone who matches my parameters on the behemoth chess.com. 

The first day of my new program was a Sunday, and I amazed myself by attempting three games on lichess. I played well in the first one, leading my opponent to resign early. Encouraged, and because that game had been rather short, I tried again. This may be hard to believe given what is going on in professional chess today, or maybe it will be easy to believe for the same reason, but after a few moves in that game lichess let me know that my opponent had been found to be cheating. The game was stopped, and points were added to my rating, so I decided to play again. This third time, though, I lost. 

From the beginning of my online chess playing I have always looked at the helpful game reviews provided by the apps, and eventually I myself started analyzing and annotating games without first referring to the app’s review. But I think that this particular game marked the first time that I was able to clearly analyze what it was in my emotional state during the game that led me to lose–another sign of my improvement. The opponents I am matched with in my lowly rating band often do not follow the accepted rules that beginners are told to live by early in the game: developing their pieces, bringing their king to safety, and not bringing the queen out too early. Such novices move a few pawns and then quickly and dramatically sweep their queen across a diagonal toward my side of the board. There are some early checkmates that can happen if one is not aware of the threats that this behavior poses, one of which is called “The Wayward Queen Attack.” I have studied some of these, but like most things, if I don’t experience them or refer back to my notes, I can be caught unawares when they actually happen. Thus I have tended to panic when a queen comes my way early, and on that particular Sunday morning, I did so, in a big way. Since that game, however, I have finally been able to do something that I had previously been unable to, which is to follow the advice of my teacher and others to simply stay calm and analyze what threats the queen might pose, defending against them one-by-one. Since that panicky Sunday morning, I have won at least two games simply by doing this.

It has been two weeks since I began playing daily. My heartbeat still accelerates when I first get into the game, but not nearly as much as it used to do. Also, I have adopted a new behavior when I am playing on chess.com, where the opponent’s rating is displayed in the upper left corner of the screen, so that it is possible to play without looking at it. On lichess you can hide all ratings by going to Settings and scrolling down to the last option under Display (thanks, chess Twitter, for pointing this out!). Also, I implemented the suggestion of another teacher to turn off chat in chess.com (no more “Hurry up, Bro” and worse). Recently on chess twitter someone posted three rules to follow when playing chess. The one I remember is to keep your emotions in check. For me, that goes for both negative and positive emotions. When I blunder my queen, I need to keep a cool head and remember that in other games that I have played the opponent ended up making similar blunders, so all is not lost. I also need to slow down when I think I see an amazing fork or other tactic. So many times my presumed “forking piece” was easily captured by my opponent, or my capture of their queen was actually a trade of queens that I did not intend. 

Soon it will be one year since I began taking chess pretty seriously. It’s a relief to feel that I have finally seen some progress, although the over-achiever in me wishes for much more. But it is a journey, not a destination.  

 

Playing Chess with Strangers

Previously I wrote about the importance of having a training partner. But what if you don’t have one, or yours is not available when you feel like playing chess? The two major online platforms, lichess and chess.com, provide ways for you to find someone to play with. Not just anyone, but someone who meets parameters that you are able to specify. Both also allow for “quick pairings,” without parameters, as well. 

Lichess has a “Lobby” on its home page. At any given moment, it displays a list of available players, by Piece Color Preference, User Name, Rating, Time, and Mode (Casual or Rated). This list occupies the top part of the Lobby. (The lower part is dedicated to variant forms of chess, such as Bughouse, which I won’t be discussing.) The players listed have used the Create a Game function to specify their parameters. As the person seeking a game, you can use the Settings function to customize your Lobby’s display to show only potential games that meet your parameters. I set mine for a time control of 10 minutes or more and an opponent whose rating is in the three-digit range. My customized Lobby lists no available games much of the time, which is not surprising for a number of reasons, including that the lichess user base numbers only around 150,000. But when I have found suitable opponents, the games have been satisfying.  

This has not always been the case for me on chess.com, where I have nevertheless played a lot more games. I play more games there because I never fail to find an opponent that meets my specifications. Why? Chess.com has more than 3 million active users, many times more than does lichess. But I have had a number of negative experiences there, both in terms of the way the games are played and in terms of the communication that takes place during the games via the chat function. Many of the chess.com users that I have been paired with try to use opening traps that result in a quick checkmate. If I successfully parry those, the players often resign the minute their going gets rough. Of course, to resign is their prerogative, but my teacher has urged me to play out every game I start, and I agree with her that that is the best way to learn. The problems in the chat dwarf premature resignations, however. I have been addressed as “Bro” and “Bru” (clearly a female couldn’t be playing chess and definitely not online). Other problems have to do with the speed of play. I have my time control on chess.com set at 30 minutes, which in today’s chess world signals that this will be a somewhat leisurely game. But recently, when I took nearly a minute to make a move, the chat read, “Hurry up.” I am not a fast player, so that soon escalated to “Are you even playing?!” and less nice urgings. This led to my discovery that you can easily disable chat during a game (or for all games) and permanently block a user from contacting you. It’s tempting to conclude that my trouble finding opponents in chess.com are attributable to the low rating range in which I am playing, and that may be a factor, but a more accomplished player recently tweeted that he had a similar problem—and his time control was 45 minutes, so the opponent had to know going into the game that the play would not be fast.

What to do if you can’t find a suitable opponent on either platform? Well, both venues offer the option of playing with the computer, and you can set a host of parameters for the game, just as you can when seeking human opponents. I will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this kind of play another time. 

I am particularly excited about this Recommendation of the Week: The Chess Journeys podcast recently interviewed Julia Rios. What a revelation! She is a chess lover on the verge of receiving a PhD in clinical psychology from the University of Michigan, and she co-hosts a podcast, Chessfeels, with a charming chess teacher named JJ Lang. In each episode, Julia brings her professional training to bear on the issues faced by adult chess improvers and even high-level players, thus filling a huge hole in the chess podcast universe. 

 

Chess Books on Steroids


As I have mentioned, one of the many attractions of chess is that it is such a book-rich pastime. But I don’t mean just books typeset on paper or displaying on your Kindle. Several companies have taken many of the best chess tactics books and integrated them with an online chessboard. Most notable of these is Chessable, which has gone one step further and add spaced repetition functionality to online versions of the books. My first experience with spaced repetition came from foreign language learning. Basically, a computer algorithm decides the perfect intervals at which you should review vocabulary for optimal retention. Chessable does the same thing with tactics and other things chess learners study, such as openings. I found one of the best possible of these ebooks near the beginning of my journey. I originally tried to use it on my Kindle, but once I got the Chessable edition I never looked back. The book–actually a series of five books–is called Learn Chess the Right Way, and you will. You can try some Chessable content at no charge–they take a lot of the courses they sell and make a free version of them called “Short and Sweet.” In addition to being great free resources, they also help you decide whether you might want to spring for the full course. They also have a generous return policy, as I learned when I purchased a book that I soon learned was for players ranked far above me.

Playing Online

Most people reading this will know that the two most popular online chess platforms are lichess and chess.com. Lichess is entirely free, and thus is often used for group chess activities like tournaments so that there is no cost to participants. I like the lichess interface very much and play there frequently. Chess.com has a free version, but you need to pay a fee if you want certain features. I feel it’s worth it, but it’s not at all necessary if you already use lichess. The fact is that I subscribed to chess.com it because I thought its analysis feature was better than that of lichess, but that was largely a beginner’s mistaken impression. If you try them both you will see that the analysis on chess.com is much more straightforward and easy to follow; however, lichess tells you much more, if you give yourself time to learn the various ways it presents the analysis, and there are many YouTube videos that do just that. There are many online comparisons of the two main online platforms: here is one of the more balanced comparisons. As you browse, you will see that the fact that the two sites use different rating systems has spawned many gigabytes of online discussion, but I will save the topic of ratings for a future post.